After the regime in Iran falls and a “free Iran” rises, the country would immediately recognize Israel, normalize US relations, and aim to broaden the Abraham Accords into the “Cyrus Accords” to unite Iran, Israel, and the larger Arab world, exiled Iranian Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi said in a statement shared early on Thursday morning.

He went on to say the new Iran would end the country’s nuclear program

"He seems very nice, but I don't know how he'd play within his own country," Trump told Reuters. "And we really aren't up to that point yet.
I don't know whether or not his country would accept his leadership, and certainly if they would, that would be fine with me."

Because the Iranian regime is widely disliked by many Iranians, the most obvious and palatable method of bringing about its demise would be to help foster a popular revolution along the lines of the “velvet revolutions” that toppled many communist governments in Eastern Europe beginning in 1989. For many proponents of regime change, it seems self-evident that the United States should encourage the Iranian people to take power in their own name, and that this would be the most legitimate method of regime change. After all, what Iranian or foreigner could object to helping the Iranian people fulfill their own desires?

Goal

The true objective of this policy option is to overthrow the clerical regime in Tehran and see it replaced, hopefully, by one whose views would be more compatible with U.S. interests in the region. The policy does, in its own way, seek a change in Iranian behavior, but by eliminating the government that is responsible for that behavior without the use of American military forces.

The United States could play multiple roles in facilitating a revolution. By funding and helping organize domestic rivals of the regime, the United States could create an alternative leadership to seize power. As Raymond Tanter of the Iran Policy Committee argues, students and other groups “need covert backing for their demonstrations. They need fax machines. They need Internet access, funds to duplicate materials, and funds to keep vigilantes from beating them up.” Beyond this, U.S.-backed media outlets could highlight regime shortcomings and make otherwise obscure critics more prominent. The United States already supports Persian-language satellite television (Voice of America Persian) and radio (Radio Farda) that bring unfiltered news to Iranians (in recent years, these have taken the lion’s share of overt U.S. funding for promoting democracy in Iran). U.S. economic pressure (and perhaps military pressure as well) can discredit the regime, making the population hungry for a rival leadership.
...
A popular revolution certainly requires homegrown leaders, even if they are brought in by sealed train, as Lenin supposedly was by Wilhelmine Germany.
...

Reza Pahlavi

Another name pointed to as a potential leader of Iran is Reza Pahlavi, the son of the last shah. In the United States, Pahlavi has emerged as a leading critic of the clerical regime, calling for it to be confronted politically and economically. Pahlavi has referred to himself as “a catalyst” to help bring about regime change and a democratic and constitutional government (including perhaps a constitutional monarchy) rather than a return to the absolutist monarchy of his father. While Iranian expatriate-sponsored media have broadcast interviews of Pahlavi into the Islamic Republic, Pahlavi lacks an organized following within the country. However, although some Iranians, particularly younger ones with no memory of his father’s regime, appear to evince some nostalgia for the monarchy,
there is no serious monarchist movement in Iran itself.

Разполагането на европейски войски в Гренландия няма никакво въздействие върху плановете на президента на САЩ Доналд Тръмп да поеме контрол над арктическия остров от Дания.

дъщерята в Kозомел, Мексиканско

“The United States needs Greenland for the purpose of National Security. It is vital for the Golden Dome that we are building,” Trump, who has vowed to seize the Arctic island from ally Denmark, wrote on social media.

“Nato becomes far more formidable and effective with Greenland in the hands of the UNITED STATES. Anything less than that is unacceptable.”

Is Trump’s obsession with making Greenland the 51st state of the United States linked with his “Golden Dome”, a $175 Billion, multi-layered missile defense system?

And the answer is Yes. Greenland’s importance to the Golden Dome lies in its geography, space infrastructure, missile-flight paths, and Arctic dominance, not merely politics or raw materials.

Missile paths cross Greenland

Greenland, positioned between the US and Russia, was described as an area of high strategic importance for Americans and for Arctic security, and as a territory known for untapped raw materials, from oil and gas reserves to critical mineral deposits, Eurasian Times reported.